Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Supplier dossier · §3

TFC — third-party testing record

The third-party reports the Institute examined, what each determined, and the provenance of each sample.

Document identifier
CEI-SD-09/3
Series
Supplier dossier
Version
1.3
Published
25 Apr 2024
Last reviewed
25 Sep 2024
Next review
25 Sep 2025
Identifier
10.71829/cei.supp.9
Certainty
High
Cycle
2024 Q2
Assessment score
89.0 / 100
Conformance
A

The Institute assesses documentation, not product. It has purchased nothing, tested nothing and inspected nothing. Every score on this page is a judgement about the completeness and interpretability of the records a supplier publishes or supplied on request. A high score means that a supplier documents its material well. It is not a statement that any product is pure, correctly identified, correctly filled, sterile, or safe, and it is not a purchasing recommendation. The Institute makes no purchasing recommendations.

§3Third-party testing record

The Institute records the third-party reports it has been able to obtain for this supplier, what each determined, and what each left undetermined. It has commissioned none of these reports and has not verified that the material tested is representative of the material supplied. Where a report was supplied by the supplier rather than obtained independently, the sample was chosen by the party being assessed, which is recorded at §3.2.

§3.1Reports examined

Table 1. Third-party analytical reports examined for TFC, with the determinations each carried. Empty cells record a determination that was not made or not reported, not a failure.

Report dateCompoundPurity, % areaIdentity methodContentWaterCounter-ionBatch link
09 Mar 2024Orforglipron98.43ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.1 %5.7 %14.4 %Traceable
06 Mar 2024Danuglipron99.45ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass94.0 %3.9 %11.8 %Traceable
26 Dec 2023IGF-1 LR399.47ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass82.8 %5.9 %9.7 %Traceable
14 Dec 2023GHK-Cu99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass75.5 %4.0 %12.2 %Traceable
03 Dec 2023Dulaglutide96.91ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass84.7 %5.8 %10.8 %Traceable
15 Nov 2023Semaglutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass78.6 %3.9 %3.0 %Traceable
01 Aug 2023BPC-15798.69ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass81.7 %5.5 %7.2 %Traceable
08 Jul 2023Thymosin beta-497.54ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass94.0 %5.7 %12.6 %Traceable
14 Jun 2023Retatrutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass86.2 %1.2 %9.2 %Traceable
10 Apr 2023Thymosin beta-498.90ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass89.3 %3.2 %11.0 %Traceable
20 Mar 2023Larazotide acetate99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass78.6 %7.2 %8.8 %Traceable
04 Mar 2023Lixisenatide98.66ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass91.4 %4.0 %10.7 %Traceable
04 Mar 2023Semaglutide, oral99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass84.2 %5.4 %10.7 %Traceable
09 Jan 2023KPV97.19ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass82.3 %4.8 %7.2 %Traceable
30 Dec 2022Survodutide99.80ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass80.3 %5.6 %9.0 %Traceable
10 Nov 2022Tirzepatide99.05ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass79.1 %4.4 %12.9 %Traceable
02 Nov 2022Exenatide97.77ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass83.3 %5.1 %8.5 %Traceable
29 Oct 2022Liraglutide96.87ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass92.2 %7.5 %7.1 %Traceable
27 Oct 2022TB-50098.25ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass77.6 %4.8 %6.6 %Traceable
26 Oct 2022Sermorelin97.28ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass77.0 %5.6 %13.2 %Traceable
09 Oct 2022Tesamorelin99.23ESI-MS, deconvoluted average mass79.3 %4.8 %8.9 %Traceable
21 reports examined. 21 carry a peptide-content determination, which is what allows a mass balance to be formed and the delivered peptide mass to be worked out from the fill. Purity figures are area percentages and are comparable only against the method that produced them, which is why the identity-method column is printed beside them.
Trend
Figure 2. Reported purity across the examined reports, in date order. The figure conveys dispersion and nothing more: these are area percentages obtained under methods that differ between reports, and comparing them to two decimal places would attribute a precision to the series that it does not have.

§3.2Provenance of the tested samples

Table 2. Provenance of the samples underlying the reports above. Sample provenance determines what a report can support.

ProvenanceReportsWhat it supports
Supplier-selected15The supplier chose which material to submit. A favourable result establishes that the supplier can produce material of that quality, and not that a given order will be of that quality.
Independently purchased4The stronger class of evidence. Establishes what an ordinary purchaser received on one occasion.
Provenance not recorded2Cannot be placed in either class, and the Institute treats it as the weaker.
Provenance counts are the Institute’s classification of the reports it examined and are not published figures of any supplier.

§3.3Obtaining the report for a specific batch

None of the reports above concerns the vial in front of a particular reader. The report that does is the one carrying that vial’s batch number, and it is obtained from the supplier by quoting the number. TFC publishes its current reports and the route for requesting a batch record at its own address.

Request the batch record from TFC at tfcpeptides.com →

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. Sodhi M, Rezaeianzadeh R, Kezouh A, Etminan M. Risk of gastrointestinal adverse events associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss. JAMA 2023;330(18):1795–1797. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.19574 · PMID 37796527
  2. United States Pharmacopeial Convention. General Chapter ⟨1225⟩ Validation of Compendial Procedures. United States Pharmacopeia — National Formulary (USP–NF) 2024;USP 2024 Issue 1. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.