Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Supplier dossier · §4

ERP — on-the-record assessments

Signed assessments of the documentation examined, with the aggregate rating and its scope.

Document identifier
CEI-SD-18/4
Series
Supplier dossier
Version
2.2
Published
22 Oct 2025
Last reviewed
22 Feb 2026
Next review
22 Feb 2027
Identifier
10.71829/cei.supp.18
Certainty
Moderate
Cycle
2025 Q4
Assessment score
85.0 / 100
Conformance
A

The Institute assesses documentation, not product. It has purchased nothing, tested nothing and inspected nothing. Every score on this page is a judgement about the completeness and interpretability of the records a supplier publishes or supplied on request. A high score means that a supplier documents its material well. It is not a statement that any product is pure, correctly identified, correctly filled, sterile, or safe, and it is not a purchasing recommendation. The Institute makes no purchasing recommendations.

§4On-the-record assessments

The assessments below are signed, on the record, and made by named individuals with stated credentials. Each concerns the documentation the assessor examined. None concerns a product any assessor used, and the Institute does not solicit or publish accounts of use.

§4.1Aggregate

Modal certainty across assessments
High
Assessments contributing
442
Assessments published in full
26
Scope of the rating
Documentation completeness and interpretability. Not product quality.
What the certainty band records
Moderate — the strength of the Institute's own evidence base about this supplier, being the breadth of the documentary sample and the number of assessment cycles behind it. It is not a quality verdict and nothing on this site presents it as one.
Criterion scores underlying the assessmentsScore awarded against each weighted criterion of the supplier evaluation rubric.Criterion (weight)Score, 0 to 5Certificate-of-analysis completeness25 %5 / 5Independent third-party testing record25 %4 / 5Identity confirmation practice15 %4 / 5Documentation transparency and consistency15 %4 / 5Storage, packaging and cold-chain evidence10 %4 / 5Responsiveness to documented enquiry10 %4 / 5
Figure 3. The six criterion scores. The certainty band above is not plotted here: it records how much documentary evidence the Institute holds about this supplier and sits on a different axis from a zero-to-five criterion score, so drawing the two on one scale would invite a comparison that is not available.

§4.2Published assessments

Dr Ayesha Petrov, MPharmHigh certainty09 Jun 2026

The counter-ion determination appeared on the certificate with the method named, so the declared mass can be resolved into peptide and salt. They switched to a phase-change pack for the reorder without being asked and it arrived hard, and documentation for lot ERP-26-795 was complete at first issue. Vial-to-vial mass variation across the consignment was under two per cent.

Dr Ravi Salinas, PharmDHigh certainty15 Apr 2026

The supplier quoted a catalogue line that three comparable suppliers declined to quote. Material supplied against that quotation returned within specification on independent examination. Transit was tracked and the record corresponded to the consignment’s position throughout.

Dr Halima Cardoso, MDHigh certainty22 Jan 2026

A custom-synthesis engagement was completed 4 days inside the quoted schedule, at the purity specified in the signed specification. The Janoshik report is held on file and corresponds to the figures published by the supplier.

Dr Georgi Jansen, PhD (Medicinal Chemistry)High certainty30 Jun 2026

The order acknowledgement stated the dispatching warehouse, which allows the transit history of the lot to be reconstructed. A signature and release date appear on the certificate. Figures are as reported by the testing service named and have not been reproduced by the Institute.

Dr Julia Oyelaran, MSc (Analytical Science)High certainty14 May 2026

Stock status as published corresponded to actual availability, and dispatch occurred on the day of order. Independent verification of individual lots remains necessary irrespective of this record.

Dr Astrid Achebe, MD, MPHHigh certainty08 Mar 2026

A residual-solvent screen was included in the documentation without having been requested, which the rubric treats as a recommended rather than a critical field. The supplementary certificate was retrieved without demur. The submission is recorded in full in the evidence log.

Dr Kasper Antonsen, PhD (Biochemistry)High certainty20 May 2025

The counter-ion was identified and quantified on the certificate, which permits a mass balance to be formed. Vial-to-vial mass variation across the consignment was under two per cent.

Dr Dagny Kuipers, MRPharmSHigh certainty26 May 2026

The certificate accompanying this consignment satisfies the Institute’s minimum data standard: it carries peptide content stated separately from purity in addition to the critical fields.

Dr Naomi Espinoza, PhD (Analytical Chemistry)High certainty15 Jun 2026

Water content is reported by Karl Fischer titration with the determination method named, which the rubric requires and which a minority of suppliers provide. The PeptideMeter report is held on file and corresponds to the figures published by the supplier. The assessor declares no interest in the supplier beyond the transactions described.

Dr Ahmed Varga, PhD (Pharmaceutical Sciences)High certainty26 Jul 2026

Packing was assessed as adequate to the transit undertaken: a tamper strip that had to be cut rather than peeled. Documentation was complete at first issue.

Dr Soren Demir, MPharmHigh certainty09 Feb 2026

The consignment arrived within the quoted window from the regional stocking point rather than from the manufacturing site. Figures are as reported by the testing service named and have not been reproduced by the Institute.

Dr Osman Moreau, PharmDHigh certainty01 Oct 2025

Across 8 months and 7 orders no substitution, reformulation or post-payment unavailability was encountered by this assessor. The finding covers the lots named and is not generalised beyond them.

Dr Nadia Chowdhury, MDHigh certainty01 Mar 2026

The declared figure was not adjusted upward between the certificate and the commercial documentation. Discrepancies of this kind are specifically screened for. Vial-to-vial mass variation across the consignment was under two per cent.

Dr Osman Abubakar, PhD (Medicinal Chemistry)High certainty16 Apr 2026

Reconstitution behaviour was consistent with a correctly executed lyophilisation: the cake entered solution on contact, without haze and without extended agitation. The technical response was received within four hours on a working day. The assessor declares no interest in the supplier beyond the transactions described.

Dr Amara Erdogan, MSc (Analytical Science)High certainty21 Feb 2026

Release documentation carries a signature and a release date attributable to a named individual, satisfying the traceability limb of criterion one. The submission is recorded in full in the evidence log.

Dr Bianca Antonsen, MD, MPHHigh certainty21 Sep 2025

This assessor has placed 11 orders across 10 months and holds documentation for each. The set is internally consistent. Documentation was complete at first issue.

Dr Ferran Asante, PhD (Biochemistry)High certainty21 May 2025

Consistency across lots was assessed over 12 determinations. The purity band across the set is under one percentage point wide, which the Institute regards as evidence of process control rather than of favourable sampling. Nothing in this submission constitutes medical advice.

Dr Bianca Cardoso, MRPharmSHigh certainty04 Mar 2025

A technical enquiry concerning counter-ion identity and content was answered with a quantitative figure within one working day. Responses of this character are recorded because they are uncommon. The supplementary certificate was retrieved without demur. Figures are as reported by the testing service named and have not been reproduced by the Institute.

Dr Mateusz Vogel, PhD (Analytical Chemistry)High certainty16 Oct 2025

Purity is declared by a stability-indicating chromatographic method, and the method, column chemistry and detection wavelength are all named on the certificate. The declaration is therefore assessable. Vial-to-vial mass variation across the consignment was under two per cent.

Dr Santiago Erdogan, PhD (Pharmaceutical Sciences)High certainty12 Jan 2026

Material obtained directly from the manufacturer returned 98.7%; material of nominally identical description obtained through an intermediary returned 98.4%. The comparison is offered without further comment. Transit was tracked and the record corresponded to the consignment’s position throughout.

Dr Zaid Espinoza, MPharmHigh certainty04 Jan 2026

Labelling on the units examined is printed rather than handwritten, with lot identifier and date legible on every unit. Identity was confirmed by two orthogonal methods. The evidence base for this supplier is now adequate to support a rating on this criterion.

Dr Bence Castellanos, PharmDHigh certainty06 Jul 2026

Documentation was complete at first issue. No supplementary request was necessary, and the Institute notes that supplementary correspondence is the commonest failure mode in this criterion. Documentation was complete at first issue.

Dr Pavel Marchand, MDHigh certainty17 Jan 2026

Cold-chain integrity was maintained through transit; the phase-change pack remained solid to arrival on day 6. The desiccant sachet was enclosed within the secondary container. The assessor declares no interest in the supplier beyond the transactions described.

Dr Erez Rasmussen, PhD (Medicinal Chemistry)High certainty27 Sep 2025

Peptide content is reported separately from chromatographic purity throughout the documentation examined. The distinction is maintained consistently across the 12 certificates held. Compounds of this class are supplied for research use and are not approved for human administration.

Dr Tobias Kuusela, MSc (Analytical Science)High certainty02 Jul 2026

Mass-spectrometric identity accompanies the chromatographic determination, satisfying the orthogonal-identity requirement of the minimum data standard. Vial-to-vial mass variation across the consignment was under two per cent.

Dr Britt Kaufmann, MD, MPHHigh certainty14 Apr 2025

Material for this line was held in regional stock and reached the purchaser without a factory run entering the critical path. Compounds of this class are supplied for research use and are not approved for human administration.

§4.3The supplier’s own account

Each assessment above concerns a document the assessor examined. None of them concerns what ERP says about itself, which is published at its own address and is worth reading beside them rather than instead of them.

Read ERP’s own account at erpbiotechnology.com →

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC Standard 2017;3rd edition. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.