Independent · non-commercial · publishes on a quarterly cycle|Current cycle 2026 Q3
Compound Evidence InstituteEvidence synthesis · established 2023Graded assessments of compounds, trials, methods and supply
Document set current to 30 July 2026
Public comment period · §3

Draft monograph: Thymalin — disposition

The disposition of every submission and the amendments that resulted.

Document identifier
CEI-CP-081/3
Series
Public comment period
Version
1.0
Published
25 Oct 2025
Last reviewed
25 Oct 2025
Next review
25 Oct 2026
Identifier
10.71829/cei.cp.81
Certainty
Not rated
Cycle
2025 Q3
Window
29 Jul 2025 – 27 Sep 2025
Status
Closed
Submissions
10

§3Disposition and amendments

§3.1Disposition table

Table 1. Every submission with its disposition. Each row links to the submission in full.

ReferenceRespondentPoint raisedDisposition
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/001Dr Matthias Wintringham industryThe document should not describe uses outside the approved indicationNot accepted
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/002Leonhard AchterbergAnti-drug antibody data are omittedAccepted in part
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/003Dr Rosalind PetrossianDoses are expressed in units that differ between sectionsAccepted
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/004Dr Leonhard QuennevilleThe pharmacokinetic section does not connect half-life to the dosing scheduleAccepted
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/005Dr Henrike JastrzębskaThe preclinical section is extensive and the clinical section is notAccepted in part
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/006Dr Kolawole Isaksen-BalogunPoint estimates are given without an intervalAccepted in part
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/007Dr Ndidi Ravensworth-IlungaTrials are described as terminated where they completed as plannedAccepted in part
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/008Ms Rhiannon Okoye-VandergraafThe document is unreadable without specialist trainingAccepted in part
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/009Dr Jolanta UttridgeThe route of administration studied is not the route in which the compound is suppliedAccepted
DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/010Dr Eulalia Sonnenberg-EzeMechanistic claims for a peptide fragment are carried without evidence that the fragment acts as describedAccepted
10 submissions in total.

§3.2Summary by disposition

Table 2. Counts by disposition, with the meaning of each.

DispositionCountMeaning
Accepted4The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.
Accepted in part5Part of the submission is accepted and part is not. The secretariat response states which part is which and on what ground the remainder was declined.
Noted, no amendment0The submission raises a point the Institute accepts but that does not require a change to the draft, most often because the draft already states it elsewhere. The location is given in the response.
Not accepted1The submission is not accepted. The secretariat response gives the reason. A submission that is not accepted remains published in full; the Institute does not remove a submission because it disagrees with it.

§3.3Resulting amendments

  1. Anti-drug antibody data are omitted — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/002. Anti-drug antibody incidence and any reported association with loss of effect are now reported where measured, and recorded as not measured where the contributing trials did not assess them.
  2. Doses are expressed in units that differ between sections — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/003. A single dose unit is now used throughout each monograph, with the source unit retained in parentheses wherever a conversion was applied, and every conversion is stated rather than performed silently.
  3. The pharmacokinetic section does not connect half-life to the dosing schedule — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/004. The pharmacokinetic section now states approximate time to steady state alongside the half-life and dosing interval, with the assumption of first-order elimination stated, and records where the assumption is not supported for this compound.
  4. The preclinical section is extensive and the clinical section is not — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/005. The preclinical section is reduced in length, placed after the clinical assessment rather than before it, and opens with a standing statement that an effect observed in an animal model is not a clinical outcome and does not support a certainty rating.
  5. Point estimates are given without an interval — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/006. Every estimate now carries its interval where the source reported one, and where it did not, the estimate is annotated as reported without an interval rather than left to appear as a precise figure.
  6. Trials are described as terminated where they completed as planned — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/007. Trial status now uses a fixed vocabulary defined in the glossary, and where the reason for stopping is not evidenced by a document the Institute holds, the status is recorded as stopped with the reason not established rather than assigned.
  7. The document is unreadable without specialist training — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/008. Every document now opens with a plain-language summary of not more than 150 words, placed above the technical abstract and carrying the same certainty language, so that the two cannot diverge.
  8. The route of administration studied is not the route in which the compound is supplied — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/009. The assessed-outcome table now carries the studied route in every row, and a standing note appears wherever the supplied presentation differs from it.
  9. Mechanistic claims for a peptide fragment are carried without evidence that the fragment acts as… — arising from DRAFT-THYMALIN-MON/010. Mechanistic claims not traceable to a primary source are removed, and those retained carry their source and a statement of whether the underlying work was conducted in vitro, in animals or in humans.

References cited on this page

References are numbered in order of first citation in this document. Each superscript in the text links to its entry below.

  1. International Organization for Standardization. ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO/IEC Standard 2017;3rd edition. identifier not held by the Institute

Identifiers are reproduced only where the Institute holds them. Where a digital object identifier or PubMed identifier is not shown, the Institute has recorded the journal and year and has not constructed an identifier.

Nothing published by the Institute is medical advice, a diagnosis, a prescription, a treatment recommendation or a purchasing recommendation. Compounds supplied for research use are not approved for human or veterinary use in any jurisdiction, and a favourable analytical assessment of a supplier is not a statement that any product is safe or effective. The Institute publishes certainty ratings and never recommendations. No telephone number, messaging handle or ordering channel appears anywhere on this site.