Consultation record

Submissions accepted — page 3

The submission is accepted and the draft is amended as proposed. The amendment is recorded in the amendment log of the document it changed and is traceable to the numbered submission.

Submissions

735 documents · page 3 of 25

Table 1. Submissions with this disposition, on this page.

Reference	Consultation	Respondent	Point raised
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/004	Draft conflicts-of-interest policy	Ivo Mountstephen	The search date is not on the face of the document
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/005	Draft conflicts-of-interest policy	Dr Vasilisa Immelmann	There is no route to challenge a disposition
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/006	Draft conflicts-of-interest policy	Dr Ivo Quintanilha	Absence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/010	Draft conflicts-of-interest policy	Dr Wojciech Kaltenbach-Mensah	Where a document is generated rather than authored, the reader should be told
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/011	Draft conflicts-of-interest policy	Vittoria Ylönen	No term limit applies to membership of the assessment committee
DRAFT-CONFLICTS-PO/012	Draft conflicts-of-interest policy	Stellan Cholmondeley-Ade	A reader who acted on a document is not told when it is corrected
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/001	Draft funding and sponsorship policy	Anselm Mountstephen	A reader who acted on a document is not told when it is corrected
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/002	Draft funding and sponsorship policy	Dr Vasilisa Immelmann	There is no route to challenge a disposition
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/003	Draft funding and sponsorship policy	Stellan Cholmondeley-Ade	The terms on which the documents may be reused are not stated
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/006	Draft funding and sponsorship policy	Georgiana Zimmerthal	No term limit applies to membership of the assessment committee
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/008	Draft funding and sponsorship policy	Dr Rurik Haverkamp-Diallo	Whether external reviewers are paid is not stated
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/009	Draft funding and sponsorship policy	Dr Evander Ashworth-Danquah	The same concept is given three different names in one document
DRAFT-FUNDING-POLI/010	Draft funding and sponsorship policy	Eamon Sandringham-Adu	The policy does not say what happens to a document the Institute is asked to remove
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/001	Draft citation policy	Vittoria Ylönen	A party that is assessed and also sponsors should be disclosed on its own assessment
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/002	Draft citation policy	Dr Evander Ashworth-Danquah	Where a document is generated rather than authored, the reader should be told
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/003	Draft citation policy	Wilhelmina Oppenheimer-Ade	The position of a contributor who withdraws consent is not stated
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/004	Draft citation policy	Professor Bartolomeu Nkosi-Lindegaard	The decision rule for a contested certainty rating is not stated
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/005	Draft citation policy	Ivo Mountstephen	Nothing states what happens to the document set if the Institute ceases to operate
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/006	Draft citation policy	Dr Beatrijs Hazelrigg	No period is stated within which a submission will be answered
DRAFT-CITATION-POL/009	Draft citation policy	Dr Jozef Brandvold-Achterberg	Absence of evidence is presented in a form a reader will take as negative evidence
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/001	Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme records	Dr Vasilisa Sandringham-Adu	A party that is assessed and also sponsors should be disclosed on its own assessment
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/003	Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme records	Professor Bartolomeu Nkosi-Lindegaard	There is no route to challenge a disposition
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/005	Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme records	Ivo Mountstephen	The search date is not on the face of the document
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/007	Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme records	Eamon Sandringham-Adu	The policy does not say what happens to a document the Institute is asked to remove
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/008	Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme records	Quentin Whitmarsh-Obi	The terms on which the documents may be reused are not stated
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/010	Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme records	Anselm Mountstephen	A reader who acted on a document is not told when it is corrected
DRAFT-PROGRAMME-RE/013	Draft policy: labelling of Institute-constructed programme records	Dr Quentin Gwynne-Sarpong	Whether external reviewers are paid is not stated
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/001	Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentations	Anselm Mountstephen	A determination does not record the version of the standard it was made under
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/003	Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentations	Dr Ottoline Fitzgerald-Nwosu	The standard assumes a reference standard of known assigned content
DRAFT-ENDOTOXIN-ST/005	Draft standard: bacterial endotoxin testing of peptide presentations	Dr Vasilisa Immelmann	The standard does not say what to do with a result outside the expected range

page 3 of 25